AMI Statement on Legislation to Require Labels on Modified Atmosphere Packaging With Minute Levels of Carbon Monoxide
Tuesday, July 24, 2007
Meat products packaged in low oxygen modified
atmosphere packaging with minute levels of
carbon monoxide (Low-Ox MAP with CO) are
products we should be proud of because they are
safe, delicious, and convenient and they have
been carefully analyzed by food safety experts
within government and at leading
universities.
It is regrettable that
with so many pressing issues before the
Congress, some lawmakers have become party to a
competitive attack engaged in by a company that
may lose business because this new technology
is succeeding. Ironically, that same company’s
patented product also maintains meat’s red
color, but uses a chemical extract of rosemary
instead of a gas mix.
Packaging
technologies and materials are not labeled on
foods. If they were, then many foods, such as
potato chips and peanuts, would have to label
the gases that keep them crispy and bagged
produce would carry labels that declare the
gases that help maintain their fresh
appearance. Instead, meat products that use
this packaging system carry the labels that
really matter: a USDA seal of inspection and a
use-by date.
Thanks to modern food
safety and packaging technology and scrupulous
sanitation in today’s meat plants, we can now
deliver longer shelf life on many meat
products. Unfortunately, when oxygen contacts
meat, it turns it brown prematurely and that
brown color can mislead consumers into thinking
a product is no longer wholesome. Eliminating
oxygen from the package and using a minute
level of carbon monoxide, in combination with
nitrogen and carbon dioxide, these meat
packages makes the color match the actual shelf
life. This benefits consumers because it is
more appealing and helps control costs. When
meat turns brown prematurely, it often is
discarded, which drives up costs to meat
processors, retailers and ultimately to
consumers.
We oppose special labeling
unique to this packaging system because it
would mislead consumers into thinking they
should be concerned about it. This technology
is safe and beneficial. Data collected by meat
companies show there is a higher level of
customer satisfaction with this particular
system.
We urge lawmakers to learn the
facts about this outstanding technology and to
disassociate themselves from the profit motives
of a competing firm and its baseless attack on
a safe product. Consumers deserve better from
their elected leaders.



